<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ayloo &#8211; Clinical Robotics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://clinicalrobotics.com/tag/ayloo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:44:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Chicago 2023 &#8211; Choledocholithiasis: Endoscopy vs. MIS</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/chicago-2023-choledocholithiasis-endoscopy-vs-mis/</link>
		<comments>https://clinicalrobotics.com/chicago-2023-choledocholithiasis-endoscopy-vs-mis/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 06:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aws-user]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hepato-biliary and pancreatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hpb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clinicalrobotics.com/?p=50610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/04room1saturday_ayloo/Thumbnails/04room1saturday_ayloo.0000004.jpg">Subhashini Ayloo (Newwark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/04room1saturday_ayloo/Thumbnails/04room1saturday_ayloo.0000004.jpg"><p>Subhashini Ayloo (Newwark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://clinicalrobotics.com/chicago-2023-choledocholithiasis-endoscopy-vs-mis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Durham 2019 Diaphragmatic Hernia Post Liver Transplantation</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-diaphragmatic-hernia-post-liver-transplantation/</link>
		<comments>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-diaphragmatic-hernia-post-liver-transplantation/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 03:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aws-user]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complex Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complex case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clinicalrobotics.com/?p=31579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Diaphragmatic_Hernia_Post_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Diaphragmatic_Hernia_Post_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg">Subhashini Ayloo (Newark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Diaphragmatic_Hernia_Post_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Diaphragmatic_Hernia_Post_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg"><p>Subhashini Ayloo (Newark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-diaphragmatic-hernia-post-liver-transplantation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Durham 2019 Robotic Cholecystectomy As A Teaching Tool In Academic Institution</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-robotic-cholecystectomy-as-a-teaching-tool-in-academic-institution/</link>
		<comments>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-robotic-cholecystectomy-as-a-teaching-tool-in-academic-institution/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 03:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aws-user]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hepato-biliary and pancreatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hpb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clinicalrobotics.com/?p=31026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Robotic_Cholecystectomy_As_A_Teaching_Tool_In_Academic_Institution_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Robotic_Cholecystectomy_As_A_Teaching_Tool_In_Academic_Institution_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg">Subhashini Ayloo (Newark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Robotic_Cholecystectomy_As_A_Teaching_Tool_In_Academic_Institution_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Robotic_Cholecystectomy_As_A_Teaching_Tool_In_Academic_Institution_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg"><p>Subhashini Ayloo (Newark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-robotic-cholecystectomy-as-a-teaching-tool-in-academic-institution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Durham 2019 Sleeve Gastrectomy After Liver Transplantation</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-sleeve-gastrectomy-after-liver-transplantation/</link>
		<comments>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-sleeve-gastrectomy-after-liver-transplantation/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aws-user]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complex Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upper GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complecx case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clinicalrobotics.com/?p=27419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Sleeve_Gastrectomy_After_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Sleeve_Gastrectomy_After_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg">Subhashini Ayloo (Newark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Sleeve_Gastrectomy_After_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Sleeve_Gastrectomy_After_Liver_Transplantation_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg"><p>Subhashini Ayloo (Newark &#8211; USA)</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-sleeve-gastrectomy-after-liver-transplantation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Durham 2019 Recurrent Intrahepatic Lithiasis After Unsuccessful Hepatico Jejunostomy Revised X2</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-recurrent-intrahepatic-lithiasis-after-unsuccessful-hepatico-jejunostomy-revised-x2/</link>
		<comments>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-recurrent-intrahepatic-lithiasis-after-unsuccessful-hepatico-jejunostomy-revised-x2/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 07:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aws-user]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complex Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complecx case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clinicalrobotics.com/?p=24572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Recurrent_Intrahepatic_Lithiasis_After_Unsuccessful_Hepatico_Jejunostomy_Revised_X2_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Recurrent_Intrahepatic_Lithiasis_After_Unsuccessful_Hepatico_Jejunostomy_Revised_X2_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg">Subhashini Ayloo</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/clinicalrobotics-mediaconverter/output/Durham_2019_Recurrent_Intrahepatic_Lithiasis_After_Unsuccessful_Hepatico_Jejunostomy_Revised_X2_S_Ayloo/Thumbnails/Durham_2019_Recurrent_Intrahepatic_Lithiasis_After_Unsuccessful_Hepatico_Jejunostomy_Revised_X2_S_Ayloo.0000004.jpg"><p>Subhashini Ayloo</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://clinicalrobotics.com/durham-2019-recurrent-intrahepatic-lithiasis-after-unsuccessful-hepatico-jejunostomy-revised-x2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago 2012 &#8211; Robotic 4th Arm: Right or Left Escort ?</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/chicago-2012-robotic-4th-arm-right-or-left-escort/</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smth]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bariatric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth arm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentation"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clinicalrobotics.com/index.php/7316/chicago-2012-robotic-4th-arm-right-or-left-escort/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/yefqdrzwz7ya45.jpg">S.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/yefqdrzwz7ya45.jpg"><p>S. Ayloo</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisional Bariatric Surgery: from gastric band to robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/revisional-bariatric-surgery-from-gastric-band-to-robot-assisted-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smth]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bariatric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bypass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complex case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edited video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gastric band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handsewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revisional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suturing"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clinicalrobotics.com/index.php/5226/revisional-bariatric-surgery-from-gastric-band-to-robot-assisted-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/a7r4kzc3ep2b11on.jpg">S. Ayloo, R. Kakarla, G. Contino, M. El Zaeedi, PC. Giulianotti<br />
Introduction: Adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is an effective surgical procedure for morbid obesity. Yet revisional bariatric procedure has been on rise with patients who has failed to achieve successful weight loss with initial surgery. We present a technical video of conversion of adjustable gastric banding to roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGBP) with robotic approach with single docking. Methods A 46-year old woman who underwent a LAGB 5 years ago with several adjustments and current BMI 44, failed in achieving adequate weight loss presented for revisional bariatric surgery.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/a7r4kzc3ep2b11on.jpg"><p>S. Ayloo, R. Kakarla, G. Contino, M. El Zaeedi, PC. Giulianotti</p>
<p>Introduction: Adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is an effective surgical procedure for morbid obesity. Yet revisional bariatric procedure has been on rise with patients who has failed to achieve successful weight loss with initial surgery. We present a technical video of conversion of adjustable gastric banding to roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGBP) with robotic approach with single docking. Methods A 46-year old woman who underwent a LAGB 5 years ago with several adjustments and current BMI 44, failed in achieving adequate weight loss presented for revisional bariatric surgery. The patient choose to proceed with RYGBP. Results The procedure began with a diagnostic laparoscopy. Extensive adhesiolysis was performed laparoscopically. The daVinci system was docked cranially and proceeded with releasing the adjustable gastric band. A Gastric pouch was created using endo GIA staplers. A double layer hand sewn gastro-jejunal anastomosis was created in omega 30 cm from Treitz ligament. Then a latero-lateral jejuno-jejunostomy was done with stapler and hand sewn suture. The afferent loop was then transected creating a Roux-en-Y. An endoscopic evaluation of the stomach and air leak test was performed, confirming integrity of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis. There were no intra- or post-operative complications. Conclusions The conversion of gastric band to RYGBP is a valid therapeutic option for patients with no substantial weight loss from their initial surgery. Revisional bariatric surgery can be performed safely and the robotic technology is a useful option in redo surgery, allowing for accurate, precise, fine dissection, with the advantage of a 4th arm assisting in retraction and exposure in a distorted anatomy.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HIATAL HERNIA WITH MIGRATION OF THE ADJUSTABLE GASTRIC BAND TOWARDS THE GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/hiatal-hernia-with-migration-of-the-adjustable-gastric-band-towards-the-gastroesophageal-junction/</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smth]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Upper GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band conservation"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMI 35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dysphagia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edited video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gastric band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gastric fundus through the band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GERD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gheza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late complication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraesophageal hernia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second-look intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stomach fundus herniated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clinicalrobotics.com/index.php/5225/hiatal-hernia-with-migration-of-the-adjustable-gastric-band-towards-the-gastroesophageal-junction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/zskzsk5oh79co21g.jpg">S. Ayloo, F. Gheza, S. D'Ugo, L. Milone, PC. Giulianotti<br />
Introduction: Solid dysphagia could be a late complication of gastric band, but rarely is associate to a massive passage of the gastric fundus through the band with an associated migration of the gastroesophageal junction in the thorax after more than 5 years. We present herein a video of a robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair in a patient with an adjustable gastric band though which stomach fundus herniated. Methods A 65-year old obese female, BMI 35, underwent 5 years ago laparoscopic adjustable gastric band positioning.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/zskzsk5oh79co21g.jpg"><p>S. Ayloo, F. Gheza, S. D&#8217;Ugo, L. Milone, PC. Giulianotti</p>
<p>Introduction: Solid dysphagia could be a late complication of gastric band, but rarely is associate to a massive passage of the gastric fundus through the band with an associated migration of the gastroesophageal junction in the thorax after more than 5 years. We present herein a video of a robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair in a patient with an adjustable gastric band though which stomach fundus herniated. Methods A 65-year old obese female, BMI 35, underwent 5 years ago laparoscopic adjustable gastric band positioning. 7 months before referring to us she started to complain severe GERD and dysphagia for solids. A chest X-ray and a CT scan showed a herniation of about 5 cm of the gastroesophageal junction in the thorax. Patient was elected for Robotic approach to correct the herniation trying to save the band. Results A diagnostic laparoscopy was performed, reveling a great number of adhesion in the gastrophrenic ligament. It was very clear that the band was migrated up towards the hiatus and she has a hiatal hernia. A careful dissection was done in delineating both pillars of the crura on the left, and then entered the gastrohepatic ligament on the right, and then complete mobilization was performed at the GE-junction and the esophagus. Circumferential dissection at the distal esophagus was done to mobilize and reduce that portion of the stomach that has herniated into her chest and pulled down. Once this was done, the crura was approximated with 2-0 Prolene using pledgets, which was snug but not tight, and the band was left alone. The operative time was 90 minutes. There were no operative complications. Patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. Conclusions The robotic approach allows complex second-look intervention where fine dissection is required, in this case reparing the herniation avoiding the band removal.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robotic upper pole gastrectomy for a GIST of the gastroesophageal junction: a new approach for an old procedure</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/robotic-upper-pole-gastrectomy-for-a-gist-of-the-gastroesophageal-junction-a-new-approach-for-an-old-procedure/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smth]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Upper GI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardial GIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esophagogastric anastomosis."]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gheza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upper pole resection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clinicalrobotics.com/index.php/5223/robotic-upper-pole-gastrectomy-for-a-gist-of-the-gastroesophageal-junction-a-new-approach-for-an-old-procedure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/guq5thbnfhf8d5lu.jpg">S. Ayloo, F. Gheza, S. D'Ugo, L. Milone, PC. Giulianotti<br />
Introduction: Upper pole gastrectomy is no more performed for gastric adenocarcinoma treatment because it cannot allow an adequate limphoadenectomy. The standard treatment for gastric GIST is the wedge resection, reserving gastrectomy for lesions close to the cardia. In these cases upper pole gastrectomy could avoid to remove all the stomach with classic total gastrectomy. Methods A gastric mass located in the fundus, near to the gastroesophageal junction was diagnosed to a 43-year old super-obese woman (BMI 52).</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/guq5thbnfhf8d5lu.jpg"><p>S. Ayloo, F. Gheza, S. D&#8217;Ugo, L. Milone, PC. Giulianotti</p>
<p>Introduction: Upper pole gastrectomy is no more performed for gastric adenocarcinoma treatment because it cannot allow an adequate limphoadenectomy. The standard treatment for gastric GIST is the wedge resection, reserving gastrectomy for lesions close to the cardia. In these cases upper pole gastrectomy could avoid to remove all the stomach with classic total gastrectomy. Methods A gastric mass located in the fundus, near to the gastroesophageal junction was diagnosed to a 43-year old super-obese woman (BMI 52). The CT scan and the endoscopic ? US were suggestive for a Gastro-Intestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) of 20 mm of maximum axis, originating from the muscolaris propria and no distant metastases were seen. We plan to perform a wedge resection or a partial gastrectomy if it was not possible spare the cardia. Results The patient was positioned in supine split leg position and the robot docked cranially. The ink was visualized in the gastric wall, in the fundus, really close to the His angle. As such, the initially planned sleeve was not amendable and an upper pole gastrectomy was scheduled. The entire esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction were mobilized, also taking down the left gastric vessels. After the resection of the proximal part of the stomach, including the fundus an part of the corpus, a gastro-esophageal mechanical anastomosis was performed. The methylene blue test performed through the NG tube didn?t show any leaks. The operative time was 190 minutes and estimated blood 150 cc. There was no intraoperative complication and the patient was discharged on post operative day 13 for a portoperative left lung atelectasia. Conclusions Resection of the upper pole of the stomach with esophageal-gastric anastomosis could be a good treatment for GIST located very close to the cardia. This gastrectomy could be easily performed in minimally invasive surgery with the assistance of the robot.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisional Bariatric Surgery: from Gastric Band to robotic assisted-Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy</title>
		<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/revisional-bariatric-surgery-from-gastric-band-to-robotic-assisted-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smth]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bariatric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Gallery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayloo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complex case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complications"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edited video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gastric band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revisional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sleeve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clinicalrobotics.com/index.php/5222/revisional-bariatric-surgery-from-gastric-band-to-robotic-assisted-laparoscopic-sleeve-gastrectomy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/dbn7jji782wcy97e.jpg">S. Ayloo, F. Gheza, D. Calatayud, PC. Giulianotti<br />
Introduction: The Gastric Banding is the most diffused procedure for morbid obese patients. Sometimes the weight loss is not appropriate, requiring a new therapeutic. We present here a video using the robotic assisted laparoscopic approach to convert a gastric banding to Sleeve gastrectomy. Methods This 43-year old woman underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding five years ago with 10 different adjustments without any benefits and a current BMI of 44. We plan to convert the procedure in a fully robotic sleeve gastrectomy.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://mediahttp.clinicalrobotics.com/thumbs/dbn7jji782wcy97e.jpg"><p>S. Ayloo, F. Gheza, D. Calatayud, PC. Giulianotti</p>
<p>Introduction: The Gastric Banding is the most diffused procedure for morbid obese patients. Sometimes the weight loss is not appropriate, requiring a new therapeutic. We present here a video using the robotic assisted laparoscopic approach to convert a gastric banding to Sleeve gastrectomy. Methods This 43-year old woman underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding five years ago with 10 different adjustments without any benefits and a current BMI of 44. We plan to convert the procedure in a fully robotic sleeve gastrectomy. Results The pneumoperitoneum was achieved and a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. The procedure started dissecting the scar tissue around the gastric band, which was then cut and removed from the abdomen. A vertical tubular gastrectomy was performed using a 38 French Bougie as a calibrator with multiple loads of the Endo-GIA stapler with GORE? reinforcement. Haemostasis was checked and an air leak test performed. The operative time was 220 minutes and estimated blood less than 20 cc. There was no intraoperative complication and the patient was discharged on post operative day 2. Conclusions The conversion of a gastric banding into sleeve gastrectomy is a valid therapeutic option in patient with no substantial weight loss although more data are needed to draw definitive conclusions. The robot is a useful option in redo surgery, allowing fine dissection.</p>
<p>A new post has been published on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://clinicalrobotics.com">Clinical Robotics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
