<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rome 2024 &#8211; Robotic Transabdominal Retromuscular Mesh (rta-rm) Repair Versus Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (l-ipom) Repair In Ventral Hernia Management: a Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="https://clinicalrobotics.com/rome-2024-robotic-transabdominal-retromuscular-mesh-rta-rm-repair-versus-laparoscopic-intraperitoneal-onlay-mesh-l-ipom-repair-in-ventral-hernia-management-a-comparative-cost-effectiveness-anal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://clinicalrobotics.com/rome-2024-robotic-transabdominal-retromuscular-mesh-rta-rm-repair-versus-laparoscopic-intraperitoneal-onlay-mesh-l-ipom-repair-in-ventral-hernia-management-a-comparative-cost-effectiveness-anal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 03:31:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
</channel>
</rss>
